Skip to content

Inside the Sheba ecosystem

An AI environment of your own, not a seat on someone else’s.

Production-ready

Access is agreed with one organisation at a time, and it begins with a process on your side rather than a plan on ours.

Before a feature list, a definition.

The platform is an organisation’s operational AI layer. That is the layer where knowledge, systems and the people who act on both meet, and where AI stops being a window open beside the work and takes a position inside it.

No figure and no customer name appear below, because the capabilities describe the platform as Sheba built it rather than a record from any one deployment.

What the platform provides, class by class

The evaluation settles which of these classes your organisation turns on, and for whom.

  • Model access and routing

    Without one point of access, every team ends up wiring its own models. Here each task is routed, from one place, to the model chosen for it.

  • Knowledge ingestion and retrieval

    Limited to what the asker may see, answers are drawn from the organisation’s own documents and records at the moment the question is asked.

  • Agents with scoped tools

    Where a step requires approval, the agent stops. Otherwise it acts through the tools explicitly granted to it, and no others.

  • Users, roles and workspaces

    Single sign-on through the organisation’s own accounts. Inside, roles decide what each person can see and change, and teams work in separate workspaces.

  • Audit

    Any action can be reviewed after the fact: questions asked, sources drawn on and steps each agent took are all kept on record.

  • Administration and monitoring

    Administrators manage people, sources and settings from one place, where dashboards also show usage and how running agents are doing.

  • APIs and connectors

    Your own systems can call the platform through APIs, and connectors reach the kinds of system an organisation already runs: customer records, documents, operational systems.

  • Export and retention

    How long records are kept, and how they are exported, follows the organisation’s own policy.

Who ends up owning this decision.

The evaluation is not finished while any one of these questions is still open, and each role brings a different one.

  • CTO and engineering

    What does this add to the stack the team already keeps running, and where does it actually run?

  • Digital transformation

    We have run pilots before. What makes this one survive the people who have to use it daily?

  • Data

    The line between what a system may read and what it may never read has to be ours to draw.

  • Government and regulated entities

    Our own rules and our own premises come first; can a system this size respect both?

  • Security and compliance

    What leaves our perimeter, and what record exists of everything that happens inside it?

  • Knowledge management

    Finding it at the moment of the decision is the problem, not writing it down.

The estimate is the last thing here, not the first.

Each answer changes the build, which is why they are settled with you during the evaluation.

  • Where it runs, who holds the data

    The organisation makes this choice first, because it decides the architecture rather than a setting inside it.

  • Which systems it connects to

    We agree the list with you before any estimate, because the hard part of an integration is ownership and upkeep rather than the protocol.

  • Who may see and who approves

    The build follows the org chart you actually run, not a tidied version of it. Access and approval are policy first and configuration second, and the policy stays yours.

  • How it is run and reviewed afterwards

    Agree the owner and the review rhythm with the deployment, not after it. Life after go-live belongs to someone inside the organisation.

No hosting list appears here, because a list reads as an offer. Where the platform runs for your organisation is agreed at scoping.

What you get out of an evaluation.

You leave with a straight answer: this platform now, a custom system, or a product that already exists. We leave understanding the operation we would be running inside.

Access is decided organisation by organisation. There is no plan to subscribe to and no published price: not a stage the platform is passing through, but how an environment of this kind is agreed.

Request an evaluation for your organisation

FAQ

Three questions worth answering before an evaluation.

Knowing whether this fits should not take a procurement cycle.

Say who owns the data and the access in your organisation; the evaluation starts from them.

Request an evaluation for your organisation